Turning · surface roughness

Surface Finish Calculator

Estimate theoretical turning Ra from feed and tool nose radius, convert between µm and µin, and solve backwards for the feed associated with a target finish.

Instant resultNo signupFormula shownReviewed Aug 2026
LIVE

Calculator

Enter the known values. Results update automatically.

in/rev
in
Primary result
Ra metric
Ra imperial
Peak-to-valley Rt approx.

Use tooling manufacturer data and stay within machine, tool and workholding limits. Calculated values are not a substitute for validated process parameters.

Immediate resultUpdates as inputs change
US machining unitsSFM, RPM, IPR, IPM
Formula visibleNo black-box output
Focused intentOne machining job per URL

Calculation method

Calculation

Ra ≈ f² ÷ (32 × Nose Radius)Rt, approx. ≈ f² ÷ (8 × Nose Radius)Feed ≈ √(Target Ra × 32 × Nose Radius)

Use values in the units shown by the calculator. Inputs must be positive and physically meaningful.

Average roughness (Ra) formula

For an ideal turned surface produced by a round tool nose, the common geometric approximation is Ra ≈ f²/(32r). Feed f and nose radius r must use the same base length unit. The calculator reports the result in both µm and µin.

Surface roughness conversion calculator

The result is shown in both major Ra unit conventions. 1 µm = 39.3701 µin, so a 6.3 µm Ra specification is about 248 µin Ra and a 3.2 µm Ra specification is about 126 µin Ra.

Ra µmRa µin (approx.)
0.416
0.832
1.663
3.2126
6.3248
12.5492

How surface roughness is measured

Ra is the arithmetic average of profile deviations over the evaluated length. Real inspection uses a profilometer and defined filtering/cutoff settings. A formula based on tool geometry predicts an ideal best-case profile; it does not replace measurement when a drawing requires a verified finish.

Ra and Rz conversions: why there is no universal exact ratio

Ra and Rz describe different properties of a surface profile. A fixed multiplier can be a rough rule of thumb for a particular process, but it is not an exact conversion that applies to every manufactured surface. MachiningCalc therefore keeps the theoretical peak-to-valley geometry labeled separately instead of presenting it as a guaranteed measured Rz.

Cutting conditions from a target Ra

Switch the calculator to Max theoretical feed from target Ra to rearrange the formula and calculate the feed that corresponds to a target finish for a known nose radius. Treat that feed as a geometric upper bound before process margin, vibration, wear and material effects are considered.

Factors that affect actual surface finish

  • tool wear, edge preparation and built-up edge;
  • machine and workholding rigidity;
  • chatter, runout and vibration;
  • material microstructure and spring-back;
  • nose-radius choice and cutting forces;
  • measurement method, cutoff and filtering.

Additional technical reference

Methodology, standards and validation

MachiningCalc separates deterministic math from cutting-data recommendations. The calculator performs the geometry and unit relationships; the correct starting cutting data still depends on the tool, work material, coating, machine and setup.

Sources and methodological references

Frequently asked questions

Surface Finish Calculator: common questions

How do I calculate surface finish?

For the ideal turning geometry used here, theoretical Ra ≈ f²/(32r), where f is feed per revolution and r is tool nose radius in the same length units.

What does a 3.2 surface finish mean?

A 3.2 µm Ra callout is approximately 126 microinches Ra. The value describes arithmetic-average roughness, not a guaranteed machining process.

What is 6.3 surface finish equivalent to?

6.3 µm Ra is approximately 248 microinches Ra. It is a unit conversion of the same Ra parameter.

What is the difference between Ra and Rz?

Ra is arithmetic-average roughness. Rz is a peak-to-valley roughness parameter. They are different measurements and do not have one universal exact conversion ratio across real surfaces.

Is the calculated Ra what I will measure on the part?

No. This is the theoretical geometric finish from feed and nose radius. Chatter, built-up edge, tool wear, runout, material behavior and measurement filtering can make actual roughness worse.

Does this formula apply to milling?

No. The f²/(32r) model here is for turning or single-point round-nose geometry. Ball-nose milling and other milling finishes require a different scallop model.